• I recently asked a person I consider a close friend if he was keeping up his Bible reading. "Yes," he responded, "my mother writes me letters regularly about the Bible"... We all know, don't we, reading the uninspired writings of other humans is not Bible study? Reading the
Bible with a focus on the words of God's son is Bible study; (
Mark 9:7;
Acts 16:30-31;
John 3:16-18) and, is the doing of God's will. (
Mark 3:31-35)
• In a similar encounter, I was talking with a group who identify themselves as Bible students; also stating they are brothers and sisters of Christ and sons and daughters of
יהוה. That assertion really draws me to them! (
Gal 3:26-29;
Mark 3:31-35) It makes me believe there may be some sincere Christians in their midst! In this conversation, they were lovingly trying to encourage me toward some of their group's Bible study books. I wanted to explain how I have, for at least the last 20 or 30 years or more, started understanding what it means to dedicate myself to looking intently at the Chief Agent and Perfecter of my faith, Jesus Christ... (
Heb 12:1-2) What I was trying to convey is when I study the Bible, I mostly just read the Bible inspired by God, rather than uninspired books; (
Ecc 12:11-12) while trying to keep my focus on the words of Jesus Christ. (
Mark 3:31-35) I further shared
[or reminded them] God has given us only one command since Jesus appeared; when He spoke from a cloud to specifically tell us to listen to his son. (
Mark 9:7) The simple idea I wanted to convey: When I study the Bible, I just actually focus on the words of Christ from
Matthew,
Mark,
Luke and
John. While that is my focus, I do study from the whole of the Bible. I didn't say it to them in our conversation, but there
can be "is" great danger in uninspired books written by humans. (
Mat 7:15) I was about to reinforce my admittedly simple Bible philosophy, which I believe is the
Bible's teaching, by sharing or reminding them of the scripture telling us the whole of the Bible, apart from the Gospels of Christ, serves or exist as a tutor to lead us to Jesus. (
Gal 3:23-25) It thus seems perfectly clear
[to me] from the Bible we should read the words of Christ to familiarity, and then, direct others to follow God's command (
Mark 9:7) and do just the same... (
John 17:3) Before I could share the
"tutor leading to Christ" scripture, one of them interrupted to direct me to one of the
"groups books" titled: "How to Study the Bible". I am sure of two things: They mean well and they left our conversation feeling they had planted seeds of truth in me, and hoping
[probably praying] their seeds would take root in me to lead me to "their" enlightenment. I can't fault them for that, I have the exact same thought and feel the same about the simple clear Bible truth I shared with them. I hope these scriptures will direct them to Christ. As I said, they are convinced they do know him and I don't dispute they do. That illustrates why we must listen to Christ and not each other. We all think we are right; meaning we think others are wrong. We should feel that way, respectfully! (
1 Pet 3:15) We must recognize we are all just works in progress. Being a work in progress is really good, though, as the alternative is remaining among the dead. (John 5:24;
1 John 3:13-15;
Rom 6:4) My point is this: Only Jesus truly knows what we need to hear and that is precisely what he taught. All any of us really have to give is to direct other people to Christ... The problem with these examples is this: How can the man in the first example be certain how much of his faith is in what Jesus actually taught, and how much is in what his mother believes Jesus taught? They might be very different. In the second example, how can one studying from the recommended book be sure they are not misled by the special terms and ideas of the book's author? His ideas might be very different from God's instructions on how to study the Bible. Right now, all sensible people are wondering how these words of mine are any different? That's my point. You can't possibly know if they are. The difference is, though, I only encourage you to hear God's command to listen to his son (
Mark 9:7) and then to do just that. Don't you see, that just can't be bad advice...
1). Exhaustive Topical Examination.
I would say that simply means use a concordance so you know what the words you read in the Bible actually mean. That can be good, but does involve the opinions of the concordance writers, along with any errors in understanding they might have. The concordance will allow you to consider everywhere in the Bible it uses the word or phrase in question, which is good.
2). Study Symbolic Language.
Understanding how words that are the same or similar can have different meanings based on use. Also, understanding how some words are not used literally but to convey an idea. An example would be the language Jesus used toward those religious hypocrites whom he said strain out the gnat and swallow the camel. (
Mat 23:23-24) And again, examples are: The heavens and earth that then was; the heavens and earth that are now; and the new heavens and new earth. Knowledge of symbolic Bible language is good, of course, when used in support of the knowledge Jesus Christ was sent to bring. (
John 10:25 & 29 of 24-29) It certainly seems knowledge of Christ's words should come first. Reading the worlds of Christ from a good "cross reference" study Bible, and checking the references, will provide knowledge and understanding of symbolisms. Jesus actually coined or first used most of them!
3). Study Time Frame.
Know who you are reading about and
when they lived. That's also good, but again, understanding that the Bible as a whole exists as a tutor leading to Christ, and God's only later day command to listen to his son, does give us a basic overview of Bible chronology. The Bible records 2000 years from Adam to Abraham [who is the
father of the Jewish nation and forefather of the Messiah], 2000 years from Abraham to Christ, and 2000 years from Jesus preaching work to our day; our day being the day of Christ's second coming or presence. Jesus, again, being the central
theme of the Bible; reading and
understanding his words should be the foremost goal of your life.
4). Importance of Context.
Context is very important! Reading God's command to the Jews that tooth should go for tooth and eye for eye, (
Exo 21:23-25) might seem, taken out of context, to fly in the face of Jesus's teaching on forgiveness. Understanding that Jesus came to bring something better than the Law Code, helps put the Law into context. (
Heb 7:18-19;
Col 2:13-14;
Eph 2:13-18) Again, just understanding God's command to listen to his son, and that the balance of the Bible is a tutor to lead you to Jesus, puts most everything into context. The details of
Bible history will fill in over time as you study and understand the life and teachings of Christ.
5). Study of Type and Antitype.
Understanding how many of the Bible teachings that have meaning for us, often have another and often more powerful second meaning.
Rahab surviving the destruction of Jericho has a powerful meaning in our seeing how God can preserve alive those who seek to serve him. It has an even more powerful meaning in seeing how the tribulation and Armageddon in our day makes our lives similar to living in the falling down walls of Jericho; and then, in our understanding how to take in Christ's words (
John 6:63) to build faith (
Rom 10:16-18) to channel God's Spirit (
Mat 17:20) to
preserve ourselves alive by faith in God's promises. (
Job 33:13-30)
Summation: I would never have looked at this book except out of respect for these Bible students and their apparent loving-kindness. Even so, I am left feeling, and I hope you can understand, following God's simple command to listen to his Son
[by reading the Gospels] will automatically accomplish everything this book suggests. And, it does so without the need for using or even coining words that don't occur in the Bible; words like "type" and "antitype." Also, it is accomplished without reading books written by men who might unintentionally introduce unscriptural ideas. (
Luke 13:25-27) Rule of thumb: If someone wants to teach you about the Bible, and feels the need to use words not even found in the Bible, be very suspicious. (
Mat 7:15) Antitype and dispensations are words not found in the Bible. I do understand they can be argued to be words to help us better understand ideas presented in the Bible. It just seems better
"for me," if I use the words directly translated from the words actually inspired by
יהוה in the Bible, to help people understand what He wants us to know. And, please remember, what He wants us to know is precisely what He sent Jesus to teach. (
John 7:16;
John 8:28;
John 1:14-18;
John 6:41-58;
John 14:23;
1 John 3:24;
John 15:10) Since teaching us about his Father is Christ's assignment, it means none of us are needed but might prove useful by directing others to Christ!